Quote from: Whoisthelorax on May 09, 2014, 04:19:50 PM

What is in common between all the people strongly against my wiki?

recent most vicious haters...

Microguy-100% goldcoin supporter. My article is not kind to gldcoin.

pandaisftw-past posts show...NXT investor from the beginning who has been giving away 100K NXT donations as people do good things for NXT. My article is not kind of NXT.

wallstreetcoiner-gold coin supporter. Recently said he/she projects the top four coins to be BTC, LTC, DOGE, and GLD (lol). My article is not kind to gldcoin.

toknormal-to quote from another thread... top 5 coins at the moment...

Quote

NXT - superb

DRK - has to be on the list due to trustless anonymous transmission technology. Way undervalued and one of the only coins I've ever seen that might have a chance of rivaling Bitcoin's value (as a complimentary currency that is, not as a replacement)

PPC - I haven't got any right now but I still think it's one of the greats
BC - probably can't discount it due to the manic following it has (although I've sold most of mine)

I put NXT, DRK, PPC, BC all in the extreme caution section. He admits being a holder of NXT. Also a massive supporter of Cinni, which my article is not kind to Cinni, either.

Of course all of these people are against my writing. It's worth it to them.

Its such a coincidence all the people who spout vitriol at this simple wiki are major supporters of coins with extremely suspect mining situations... Cheesy

My analysis is simple and meant for the NON mining public. I urge them throughout the wiki to do more investigation than just my simple work. The amazing thing is that a number of regulars here (myself included) never really did a simple investigation into all of these coins. They came out so fast with so many "new" features... I bet a number of these in my wiki will surprise people.

Of course I/we take issue with your "analysis" because we (mainly those involved with PoS projects) understand that not-instantmine/instantmine is too simplistic. I'm sure this works perfectly for copycat PoW coins, because all you can do on these coins is basically mine them, and that's it. What was the last "slow-mined" PoW coin that did something revolutionary Bitcoin has not done? Looking at the top 20 on CMK... that list is basically zero - maybe namecoin, but it's already outdated.

You're talking about "investments", which includes both minable and non-minable coins. If you're going to lump all PoS coins into the "instantmine" section (when in reality, there is no "mining" in PoS), you're doing everyone who follows your analysis a disservice. Understandably, this is what the topic is about, but IMO, it's flawed, and that will become apparent in the future. I would say that people are getting tired of buying coins whose only feature is that they can be slowly mined and do nothing else but generate profit for the miners. The market will be shifting to doing useful work (and already is, look at maidsafe) and more efficient work. Distribution is important, but it's no longer the sole determining factor in a coin's success.

Anyways, not hating on your analysis, but again, IMO it's too simplistic to take seriously.

Pandaisftw