Quote from: Zarathustra on May 10, 2014, 07:17:20 AM

Quote from: AnonyMint on May 09, 2014, 10:23:54 AM

Quote from: Zarathustra on May 09, 2014, 08:26:13 AM

Quote from: AnonyMint on May 03, 2014, 10:24:10 AM

Quote from: Zarathustra on May 03, 2014, 10:14:12 AM

Quote from: AnonyMint on May 03, 2014, 09:10:55 AM

Well folks you see how politics devolves into an invasion into personal privacy and choice.

The issue was property rights, but the Communists will always try to divert it from that of course.

The thread is basically dead, because there is nothing more to discuss.

Opt-out and let the Communists do the megadeath ritual.

Only collectivists (Communists and Capitalists) demand property rights. Real humans (communities beyond the society) don't. Communism/capitalism is the perversion of the community.

Thus you agree to let me cut off your penis. It is not your property. Your penis is a nomad that should roam and not be possessed nor owned.

Conflating property rights with collectivism is a signal you are losing your sanity.

A brain (if you have one) is not a property. It's a brain.
Demanding state-guaranteed rights is a collectivist behavior,whether your state is 'local' or global.

I never said anything about state guarantees for property rights. It is about the sovereign's ability to protect his rights, and that includes the fruit and food sources of your tribal jungle nirvana fantasy.

You should study tribal life. It was fraught with continuous war and kidnapping of women.

Bullshit. These are wellknown fairytales of civilized collectivists, distributed by Jared Diamond et al.
They don't know anything about anarchy, the times before the invention of patriarchy.
http://gerhardbott.de/das-buch/summary-in-english.html

Get your head out of your ass and read about the history Mindanao where I am now, and the tribes in the mountains of Luzon.

Quote from: Zarathustra on May 10, 2014, 07:46:06 AM

Quote from: AnonyMint on May 09, 2014, 10:23:54 AM

Quote from: Zarathustra on May 09, 2014, 08:26:13 AM

Quote from: AnonyMint on May 03, 2014, 10:24:10 AM

Quote from: Zarathustra on May 03, 2014, 10:14:12 AM

Quote from: AnonyMint on May 03, 2014, 09:10:55 AM

Well folks you see how politics devolves into an invasion into personal privacy and choice.

The issue was property rights, but the Communists will always try to divert it from that of course.

The thread is basically dead, because there is nothing more to discuss.

Opt-out and let the Communists do the megadeath ritual.

Only collectivists (Communists and Capitalists) demand property rights. Real humans (communities beyond the society) don't. Communism/capitalism is the perversion of the community.

Thus you agree to let me cut off your penis. It is not your property. Your penis is a nomad that should roam and not be possessed nor owned.

Conflating property rights with collectivism is a signal you are losing your sanity.

A brain (if you have one) is not a property. It's a brain.
Demanding state-guaranteed rights is a collectivist behavior,whether your state is 'local' or global.

I never said anything about state guarantees for property rights. It is about the sovereign's ability to protect his rights, and that includes the fruit and food sources of your tribal jungle nirvana fantasy.

This is what anonymint, the notorious collectivist is telling us:

"When a government attacks its own people it becomes illegitimate. The people have a right to a representative government."

He wants to be governed and patronized. He thinks that there are legitimate governments out there. What a 'living' cartoon of an anarchist!

I've never written such a thing. I said people are rising up because they don't feel represented. I never said I prefer to replace it with a representative government. Instead I've written that democracy is always a power vacuum and thus always ends up where we are now.

I've said the smaller the entities of political organization, the less severe the power vacuum. At the tribal level within the human's Dunbar limit, corruption is well contained.

I'm aiming for a Knowledge Age, where each person is entirely free of governance and corporations.

My disagreement with you is you are conflating things. You think technology can only exist with governance and corporations. I think technology can exist and boost individual prosperity in an anarchistic manner.

You instead want everyone to remain a caveman without any technology. You better get rid of the hunting bow and discovery of fire too. Roll Eyes