Quote from: gektek on May 13, 2014, 11:00:35 PM

Quote from: rdyoung on May 13, 2014, 10:56:12 PM

Quote from: gektek on May 13, 2014, 10:51:48 PM

I thought we we're basically all supposed to be sharing, pyramid style and all...

We were, but the older fpga deposits weighed down the hashrate for the deposits that came after it. Look back for my posts on this. A few of us did some detailed math and discussion on this.

Ahh...so my mistake was not taking advantage of the 'pre order' thing that was happening last year. I just made direct deposits so they would start earning right away and da dah dah dah... I get it now...sorta... ;P

It would not have mattered. He has assigned ALL deposits a hashrate based on the date/time of the deposit. My 47.xxbtc account is getting 11.6ghs, some of that is newer deposits, but all in all its close to the hashrate from before the change. If you deposit now, you get 137.4ghs per btc. You wouldn't have gotten that with the "preorder".

I can't back this up with any hard evidence, but I think that it will be sooner than we think for that hardware to knock the "old" deposits up to the 1stgen asics. I went up the chain above me, no wandering just straight up and the average completion was 70% when I did the math. Factor in pyra saying that there isn't a lot of large deposits and I don't think we will be waiting that long.