Quote from: jh00 on May 15, 2014, 07:32:05 PM

Quote from: aamarket on May 13, 2014, 11:09:11 AM

It needs ">>(i%32))" I'd say - and I do not know why it works fine on x64, but the change helped to get seemingly proper targets on ARM.
Still no share submitted, so I do not know if it helped.

Thanks for spotting this. I have committed a fix to the xptMiner repository. The performance difference should be insignificant on x64/x86.
I also know there are some other places in the xpt source where memory alignment can make problems. Especially all the xptPacketbuffer_* functions have unaligned read/write access which is supported on x86/x64 but not on other platforms, but I don't know if it matters on ARM.

Yes it does, one fix I had to deploy summarized in:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=424517.msg4883101#msg4883101

Regards,

--
bsunau7