Quote from: psikogeek on May 08, 2014, 04:32:07 PM

I propose to sit on this for 3 months until 8-8-2014, and then launch a community fork. It ought not be a hostile takeover. We computer literates are accustomed to abandonware. Cryptocurrencies minimize authority in favor of community. The coin itself owns no intellectual property. We ought to make peace with the owners of the most appealing and most related intellectual property.

We may not need to act; there is no reason other than your feelings that the accepted devs must comment every day, week, or even month. The book goes on even after the author perishes. Some works are reborn by the hand of a new editor from a later generation.

rrrrrrrrr I propose to sit on this for 3 months until 4-8-2014, and then launch a community forking. rrrrrrrrrrr

Quote from: bigtimespaghetti on May 13, 2014, 05:50:23 PM

Quote from: Hippie Tech on May 13, 2014, 04:43:49 PM

I'm in a wiki state of mind today. Grin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud

Quote

Fraud is a deception deliberately practiced in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain (adjectival form fraudulent; to defraud is the verb).[1] As a legal construct, fraud is both a civil wrong (i.e., a fraud victim may sue the fraud perpetrator to avoid the fraud and/or recover monetary compensation) and a criminal wrong (i.e., a fraud perpetrator may be prosecuted and imprisoned by governmental authorities). Defrauding people or organizations of money or valuables is the usual purpose of fraud, but it sometimes instead involves obtaining benefits without actually depriving anyone of money or valuables, such as obtaining a drivers license by way of false statements made in an application for the same.

Exactly. The more I think on it the more I think this coin should be left to disintegrate. I would not be interested in supporting a coin with such a negative beginning. An outright rebrand and rerelease would need to be done to cut all ties with the original devs.

los senores hava a speak'd

v0.7.0.0 /is it ok?