Funny how a theory of global destruction is such a big deal when radiation from Fukushima is blanketing the globe and is a very real threat proven to exist. Why do you consider this less of a threat?
Lets assume what you say is true, what can we do to stop it ?
Do you understand what I'm getting at ?
What is the level of radiation I will receive from this from the other side of the world ? How does it compare to existing background radiation ?
P.S. Answering a question with more questions is not an answer.
Lets assume you are correct. There is nothing we can do about Fukishma. It is 100% a complete red herring.
You obviously can't use logic.
The amount of radiation I am receiving from Fukushima is not measurable, and furthermore any radiation I measure can not be attributed to Fukushima. Correlation does not mean causation.
If you are a tutor, then move amongst retards with money because that is the only way it'll work !
Although totally free to insult anyone including myself, making a "scientific" point about your position by calling people "retards" or edit your post days later might not be the best or smartest move. I am just saying...
Keep on the good work though. Don't be afraid. Never edit anything back! Be proud of what you defend! Always!
