Quote from: jalmari on May 18, 2014, 09:30:53 AM

Quote from: brightlight on May 18, 2014, 09:20:31 AM

Quote from: jalmari on May 18, 2014, 09:17:30 AM

Quote from: joel511 on February 23, 2014, 11:06:41 PM

3. Any wallets created after 5/16/14<--THE DAY OF ATTACK, are invalid and WILL NOT RECEIVE NEW COINS. This will eliminate the attackers stash of coins and we will be left with a surplus. Mintpal lost 22 mil coins from the double spend. We will reimburse Mintpal, so that they can give users back their coins.

I don't understand how this would eliminate the attackers coins. He/she could just send the coins to some older address?

Look at 4th Top address, which ends with BMCh at http://nc2chain.info/top100

This is where attacker coins gone...

As I understand, this is the first address and the addresses to which coins are sent from this to eliminate in distribution.

Anything other could be proved with transaction history and blockchain.

Ah ok, so it is known that this address contains attackers coins? But, it has only 1.6M coins which is not enough for attack, right?

Those coins come from this http://nc2chain.info/address/CT6hK54g9MT3gnK72YGWgVYNUEqQu56HCc (from last transaction). As I understood this address holds evidence of double spend.

I don't know if it is possible to attack with that small amount. Someone tech savvy could explain it, hopefully.