Quote from: Agent86 on May 18, 2014, 01:05:32 PM

For instance, I think if you staggered your initial IPO you would have had less complaints from investors.

Next time I will do an IPO, I'll do it this way

It's too late to change anything at this point.

Quote from: Agent86 on May 18, 2014, 01:05:32 PM

Also, I used to like the idea of world community grid, but truthfully it's a waste of time. It's not like you'll be getting it out to some big portion of the public. The only people that will mine it that way are crypto miners who will do it until it's not profitable. You may as well just let people buy shares instead of going through the hassle. This just sounds good to people who are still stuck in a POW mindset.

I agree. I just like the idea that even if that system is gamed it will at least do good for humanity. It can also give us minor publicity and cater to people who like to mine and have some GPU surplus left from earlier Bitcoin days.

Quote from: Agent86 on May 18, 2014, 01:05:32 PM

What if the person who stole all the Mt.Gox funds got a big stake in simcoin?

Yep, that's a big concern, thought about it too.

Quote from: Agent86 on May 18, 2014, 01:05:32 PM

BTW, NXT has switched away from the numerical addresses.

Well, you know who they have to thank for that, right? Wink

Quote from: Agent86 on May 18, 2014, 01:05:32 PM

I think you may be losing ground doing development all by yourself when bigger teams are working on other projects. Will simcoin really be relevant by the time it is released?

As if the only advantage of Simcoin is RS addresses... There are other advantages in having a single person in complete control. One thing I don't like about NXT in particular is how easy things get thrown into the pile, without much consideration.

You sound as if sending money from person to person is gonna be obsolete in a year...

All the other coins are "results oriented". Can't at least one coin be "details oriented" for a change?