Quote from: karol on May 19, 2014, 02:42:34 PM

Quote from: cryptx on May 19, 2014, 02:37:48 PM

Quote from: karol on May 19, 2014, 02:35:50 PM

Quote from: cryptx on May 19, 2014, 02:28:06 PM

Quote from: EdoBcn on May 19, 2014, 02:09:13 PM

So, you raised ~2.5 million from shareholders, added 1 million from your side, spend only 1% of your solar powerplant capacity, and then you want the shareholders to halt getting dividends? I don't think you need us for this operation. You could mine by your own... right? What am I missing here? The fees you collected until now are nothing compared to the magnitud of money you usually manage... is this a small distraction toy for you? Because for many of the shareholders it meant the difference between day and night. Not arguing here, just trying to understand why you need to get external funds for such an attractive and speculative business plan. Or why you need ADDITIONAL funds to increase operations.

Pffff I'm getting tired of defending even things like this. If we did not invest in this project, it would never be where it is today.

We have put a lot of effort, time and money in this, believe me. You can see where we are today, 46% in dividends paid + share price a lot above IPO.

Now we try to take all this to the next level, I mean this is the real deal. If you want to be part of something big, this is it.

If you just dont like the way this came all together or where we want to aim for in the future, just dont invest.

How are You counting this 46%?

Last Ipo was for 0.05, according to havelock and what I get after this IPO i recived 0,00883 divident per share so it is 17,6 %.

PetaMine started back in August 2013 and we have been mining and paying dividends back in October 2013.

Great that You are operating so long but it is very strange counting, I paid 0.05 so get 17.6 % -
You should listed all IPO with dividents not just saying that You paid 46% which is not true, You are teling about missunderstanding, wonder why?
Please give real informations with clear statments not what is good for You.

that is a clear statement. Since they began petamine, they paid 46%... (not that I have numbers to back this up).

just because you didn't know they started before you bought into the (2nd?) IPO, doesn't mean that it's not a clear statement. It's just not clear to you. It was clear to me...

that said, cryptx could have said, "we have paid 46% since we began our operations in Aug 2013"... yes, that would have been clearer.