Quote from: Matni on May 22, 2014, 06:12:50 PM

Quote from: Koko on May 22, 2014, 06:08:41 PM

Quote from: Matni on May 22, 2014, 06:02:16 PM

Quote from: Koko on May 22, 2014, 05:33:37 PM

Quote from: Matni on May 22, 2014, 05:11:23 PM

Quote from: lionheart78 on May 22, 2014, 04:44:56 PM

Quote from: akk123 on May 22, 2014, 02:19:27 PM

This distribution should be re-done with minumum 100 post and activity. Otherwise this coin wil get dumped in the first opportunity.

your idea is good but i think it's better to get yourself out of the qualified sign ups to make it fair.. a 300+ activities may do ^^ so how would you feel about it? huh?!

The problem with 300+ activity is most of the members on BCT with 300+ don't come to the dark side of the crypto. When was the last time you saw someone with 300+ post around here?

The dev for Sync who uses his own account is on 240 and has 1 year and 1000+ post.

I think 120 which is Senior Member status is a pretty good requirement. And I'm saying that as a 98 Member...

Well there are at least a few 300+ in this thread and plenty of late 200's and I don't see any of them bothered too much. It's very unlikely that the dev is going to change the rules at this point so this discussion about requirements is unlikely to go anywhere. Next time when someone pre-ann a coin, you can tell him how they should go about it.

I think the system the dev had worked, yeah a lot of people were being massively impatient, but this is crypto so you have to expect that. I hadn't see any 300+ members, but I wasn't giving it much thought unless it was obviously low.

I'm intrigued to see the list with the people who failed to claim a stake, especially the person with 19 alt accounts.

You haven't seen the +300 members because you haven't read the thread. You just came in late and started making assumptions.

Post #33 on page 2 would disagree with you...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=606809.msg6701938#msg6701938

Then you should have kept up with the thread then.