Quote from: cedivad on May 24, 2014, 01:08:08 PM

Quote from: Bicknellski on May 24, 2014, 12:55:32 PM

But you know what... the more I look into August I fear I just spent double what the $ per Gh/s will be then or worse.

If HF really has a 28nm design that is 2 to 3 times more efficient than the previous one, and if they really taped it out already, we are basically safe. When you make such a claim in a contract, you need to have already accounted for the money to pay for it, right? Or were you just hoping on more sales from the very people you screwed? "our customers are mainly returning customers", re their lawyers bs.

If they didn't do the tapeout yet, and we raise enough to pay for it, I would at least consider it. Efficiency will be paramount in a matter of weeks and that design, if viable, could be really valuable.

Yup... so much to know. So little time. I don't envy anyone who is involved in this mess. Creditor or Debtor at this point doesn't matter. You have to kiss and make up so fast that you are going to feel like a whore no matter what happens. But given the push in the courtroom today I think even if the lawyers don't get it the parties do understand there is little time for hate left. You will have to suck it and work out the best solution for everyone. It could be the turd of all turds or you could come out ok.

I think it was a smart move to force this and put, as it was said so well before, the adults in charge. If you have 40,000 working chips then you do have a great resource from which to build something.