Quote from: BrainShutdown on May 27, 2014, 07:41:52 PM

Quote from: janos666 on May 27, 2014, 07:35:17 PM

Quote from: gminerz on May 27, 2014, 07:29:27 PM

Quote from: Standhaft on May 27, 2014, 07:28:23 PM

Quote from: janos666 on May 27, 2014, 07:27:23 PM

Quote from: TsuyokuNaritai on May 27, 2014, 07:23:27 PM

Quote from: janos666 on May 27, 2014, 07:14:53 PM

I am not a troll but I honestly don't understand how it's possible to start paying masternodes from block rewards without hardfork.

We already had the hardfork to start paying them, but then had to switch them off temporarily. The fix & switching back on doesn't need a hardfork.

But wasn't that temporal shutdown carried out by a (yet another, very quick) hardfork just like the earlier start of the payments was?
How does the network know if masternodes should be paid or not?

pool updates probably.

smart guys...

i want to really hear evan to report the cause of fork!

I was very eager to initiate an all-in the panic buy in the moment when Evan posted an update (because I figured the price will bounce back if his news are great). But honestly, I wouldn't touch the DRK market with a stick until somebody explains this (with not too much technoblabby but not just a short scifi magic wizard tale about giant metal dragons).

Some one correct me if I'm wrong but as far as I can see the fork to support masternode payments was made and successfull.
Later some problems were found because there were some MN/clients in older versions that caused (back?)forks.
So Evan launched a patch so that the correct nodes simply ignored the older ones and patched pools to stop the payments...

To sum up things we are in the correct fork that allows MN payments.

I have the same confusion as janos666 over why it would not require another hardfork to restart masternode payments and/or to increase the amount of the mining reward that is allocated to masternodes.