Quote from: poornamelessme on May 26, 2014, 03:21:46 AM

Quote from: cryptoholic11 on May 26, 2014, 03:02:50 AM

The problem with that is he might not even be on the XBC dev team anymore and if that is the case, his actions on this thread and XLC are a bit sketchy. Doesn't do much for investor confidence.

According to what was said by others, no, he's not on the XBC dev team. He hasn't been involved with XBC in some time now really, at least in a direct way.

I assumed everyone knew this from the start. jiapetz provided a detailed explanation, but his post was deleted.

The only thing I had an issue with was the dev implying that the xbc wallet was the reason for a lack of dev activity here. He has no direct involvement with the xbc wallet, isn't on the xbc team, and certainly didn't code the new wallet. So I was confused as to what he even meant.

And his actions on this thread are already sketchy, due to him deleting posts. That, and unusually long periods of silence from him.

More than one person has access to this account so I am speaking only for myself (XBCplus). I only delete posts which are blatant lies or are off topic. That is it. Sometimes people will find that their posts were deleted because they were responding to FUD. Although I appreciate their efforts, I would rather not steer off topic so I would delete the lot so there is no 'bias'. This ANN thread is about development discussion, not "my coin is better than your coin" wars etc. It is counter-productive and it looks bad for people who genuinely come to this thread seeking more information on XLC.

I was not being held up directly from the XBC wallet, but people I needed to talk to about XLC were being held up by the XBC wallet. So it indirectly was affecting XLC progress.