Quote from: sorryforthat on May 28, 2014, 11:39:15 AM

Quote from: johncitizen on May 28, 2014, 11:23:46 AM

It is clear why the dev launched quasar "QuazarCoin was launched May 8, 2014 after discussion in the community, without premine or instamine."

Monero seem to think they are unique. In fact, they cloned Bytecoin, their innovation was = (~80% mined within 4 years instead of 2 years like bytecoin.)

Quasar has a much more logical approach in terms of emissions. Im not sure how well monero will deal with the inflation.

Monero have already perceived Quasar as a threat. I can understand. Quasar is economically superior.

You release a coin fair for everybody to the game, or someone will come along and do a better job. Its quite obvious how bytecoins inflation/instmine worked out for them, nobody wants to use it regardless of the technology. All Monero have done is cloned them and their rapid mining scheme.

You obviously do not know what you are saying. You are repeating lies from other threads about bytecoin and have not been following the economy on either coin nor innovation. Your coin is built on a lie from a dev who has already made a lot of money of all of you. Shame to think this will get any better, the only time you will see QCN update is when Monero updates. Remember that this is not a Bytecoin fork, it is a Monero fork.

To say that Monero has offered nothing unique. Everything that allows you to mine in a pool, gui wallet, what ever it may be, is due to Monero. Please do your homework.

The devs and the community are far more knowledgeable and active.

In close, as I write this QCN is half the price of Monero and it will not get much better. The pools speeds have all dropped and you guys are holding on to what may I ask?

Actually, I'm quite knowledgable on the subject.

My above post is entirely correct. There are no lies, only facts. I hold all these coins but its ironic that monero conduct themselves as if they invented the wheel. The quazar dev has made no money off anybody, there are no lies here. All the funds acquired are donated or mined with hard work off the block chain.

It was not said that monero have nothing unique. I think they can build some great software. It is noted that any claim to "flagship" is redundant as its a bytecoin clone. Theres no need to be ashamed of that, most alts are btc clones.

Its interesting that there is a large influx of monero supporters trying to harm this coin. I can understand why. For a coin that is over %5 mined for a few weeks old, there sure would be a lot of bagholders trying to protect their stash. It appears in the best interest to promote monero, its the difference between unloading your coins that you mined for a few dollars - for a couple hundred grand.

It is a curious notion. Why did monero opt for the instamine? Would a fair mining period not have made more sense? Im sure the community would agree on this one. The fancy mining period clearly benefits those in early with great magnitude- it is designed to do so.