Quote from: ArtForz on January 19, 2012, 03:03:43 PM

Quote from: Stokkie on January 19, 2012, 02:58:40 PM

Quote from: Nicksasa (Poolbits) on January 19, 2012, 10:43:56 AM

Quote from: btc-e.com on January 19, 2012, 09:36:06 AM

https://btc-e.com/news/55

Thank you!

Also, new update out. It's HIGHLY reccomended you update to v4 or latest github because we added some checkpoints, increased the initial DL of the blockchain, applied a performance fix and changed the fees to a somewhat better value. http://www.mediafire.com/?hv0e5qjlgkpzlzb

What fees?

*checks commit log*
Default transaction fee was increased from 0.0005/kB to 0.1/kB.
Seems to still use standard BTC rules for which tx don't require a fee.
See LTC TX spam fiasco for the reason.

So even after the LTC TX spam fiasco someone release an alt-coin w/ same vulnerability?

I mean I thought in theory the point of alt-coins is to be a learning environment. If scam-coins aren't going to patch the mistakes of prior scam-coins then they aren't even make a token effort to innovate.