Quote from: ChasingTheDream on May 31, 2014, 03:17:35 PM

Quote from: merc84 on May 31, 2014, 11:18:40 AM

Quote from: primeGPU on May 31, 2014, 10:34:28 AM

This is from the lead developer at F@H on reddit:

Quote

Yeah and the CureCoin developers give themselves 10% of the profits. Plus they have centralized control of the distribution of coins. Their centralized servers gather publicly available data from Folding@home and enter it into the CureCoin network. If they screw this up or get hacked the whole coin is compromised. If Folding@home get's hacked or any of the 100s of Folding@home work servers which are run at Universities around the world gets hacked the coin is compromised.

I tried to work on these and other issues with the CureCoin developers but they responded quite hostility and charged ahead with CureCoin as is. As their website says, they have no affiliation with Folding@home or Stanford University.

Disclosure: I'm the lead developer at Folding@home.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/26xvh5/curecoin_cryptocurrency_based_on_coupling_sha256/

who can say if this is really the lead dev of F@H it is easy to claim such things...

Yes and one would think accurate information would at least be used if they are going to post about it. Sounds like more FUD.

Not saying that the info is correct. But would like to hear comments from the devs about this part:
"I tried to work on these and other issues with the CureCoin developers but they responded quite hostility".