Quote from: Propulsion on May 31, 2014, 10:00:24 PM

Quote from: MrWHALE on May 31, 2014, 09:58:41 PM

Quote from: Joshuar on May 31, 2014, 09:55:48 PM

Quote from: MrWHALE on May 31, 2014, 09:54:01 PM

http://oi61.tinypic.com/2nh420z.jpg

XC was paid to be made by atsecure(XC dev), just like coingen website makes alt coins for BTC.

Above pic is atsecure(XC dev) leaving loljosh(guy who makes alt coins for BTC) a positive comment, 1 day after XC is released

Stop trying to promote coingen, pay-to-be-made, coins, thanks.

Ultimately, I don't care what the fuck atcsecure had to do with loljosh (because nothing is certain). All I know is atcsecure's anon tech is already demonstrated using multi-path xnodes for decentralized anon transfers. So seriously --> Your argument is a fucking straw-man

XC anon proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uTgnZAFuNU&feature=youtu.be

Someone here should make an XC testnet block explorer to prove just how anonymous this xc coin actually is.

XC Anon proof:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uTgnZAFuNU&feature=youtu.be

XC Testnet block explorer from user terse-helper:
http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/26yubh/block_explorer_for_yesterdays_test/