Quote from: MrWHALE on May 31, 2014, 10:29:54 PM

Quote from: Propulsion on May 31, 2014, 10:24:53 PM

Quote from: MrWHALE on May 31, 2014, 10:21:49 PM

Just trying to be an upstanding citizen by organizing some relevant information for investors who want to know the truth:

DRK's method of coinjoin does not nor will not ever bring 100% truly anonymous transfers.
Proof: "Why CoinJoin, as Used in DarkCoin,does NOT bring Full Anonymity"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/227369807/Bitcoin-Coinjoin-Not-Anonymous-v01

Does this same proof apply to XC as well? The short answer: No, this does not apply to XC because XC uses a unique multi-path solution and NOT coinjoin.

Does XC's anon function even work? Yes!
Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uTgnZAFuNU&feature=youtu.be

All I want is investors to make the most informed decisions when investing their money. Why invest in DRK when Evan himself says the anon feature is not complete nor did he ever promise 100% anon transfers? See proof: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg7060893#msg7060893

Spend your money wisely folks. Everything written here is true, but don't take my word for it, do your own research.

This is completely wrong. XC is a coin gen clone from loljosh.
XC can not even provide a testnet block explorer for there supposed "anonymity". Instead they literally spam "Look at this video. It works!"

No, you're completely wrong. And quit it with the straw-man loljosh FUD.

The testnet block explorer was up for hours and verified by comm members:
http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/26yubh/block_explorer_for_yesterdays_test/

The only reason it was taken down is because testing is now over for the new wallet release tomorrow.

That is exactly what i said at the main XC forum, its good to see we share the same opinion.