Quote from: TheDagger on June 01, 2014, 08:15:54 AM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 01, 2014, 08:06:42 AM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 01, 2014, 12:35:33 AM

Quote from: TheDagger on June 01, 2014, 12:15:05 AM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 01, 2014, 12:01:55 AM

So... does that mean you have wallets setup in all exchanges and that the coins will go through the wallets that you have setup in those exchanges?

The more wallets that are created (within an increasing number of exchanges) the stronger the anon service will become.

So... you go create these wallets explicitly in these exchanges without their knowledge or you have partnership/collaboration?

So, that means MAJOR lag between transactions because for each "exchange node" that you pass through, you have to deposit into each exchange, then wait for their confirmations, before you can withdraw them out of the exchange and move onto the next "exchange node" and withdraw (repeat to X) before finally getting to the destination address??

You keep avoiding this question. I would assume that this is exactly the method you are using and that there will be major lag between transfer...

This will be nothing but FAIL COIN...

The assumption on how the system will work, as outlined in the above is incorrect.

Whilst there will be some lag (due to the nature of this highly anonymous system), transactions will take nowhere near as long to complete as described in the above scenario.

How is this system any better than a centralized mixer?

btw the lag will be terrible, every exchange has a different confirmation number and if it is higher than 5, the network will be ultra slow