Quote from: stealth923 on June 01, 2014, 11:36:45 PM

Quote from: Coin_Viking on June 01, 2014, 11:31:15 PM

Quote from: stealth923 on June 01, 2014, 11:17:32 PM

Quote from: CryptoClub on June 01, 2014, 11:12:57 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 01, 2014, 11:11:21 PM

Quote from: CryptoClub on June 01, 2014, 11:09:29 PM

Quote from: roede94105 on June 01, 2014, 11:05:36 PM

Quote from: Grifftech on June 01, 2014, 10:46:19 PM

Quote from: stealth923 on June 01, 2014, 10:45:04 PM

"REV2 will have a solution to the bad actor problem. Using a dynamic learning trust system"

Create Xnode - steal coins.

Shutdown Xnode - Move Coins to new Xnode

steal coins.

Shutdown Xnode - Move Coins to new Xnode

Rinse, repeat.

Cant wait to get started.

Lol, good luck with your uber hax skillz /facepalm

Can someone explain if that is a potential risk?

I know it's probably FUD, but it seems somewhat "logic", anyone to explain?

He wants people to sell XC and buy DRK, read his previous posts. XC and DRK are the two strongest anon Alts. XC appears to be developing tech very quickly however. Oh, someone already stole 1000 DRK, so people should not be throwing stones.

There is no risk, the trust system is designed to prevent this and other potential attack vectors

Isnt the point of this crypto to be "trustless" - not trust...the minute you place trust in an entity - the decentralization aspect of the coin diminishes.

The dev has absolutely no idea. How vague and ambiguous can you be in a response???

Stealth, you are correct in stating that originally crypto was intended to be a trustless and decentralized system, but drk masternodes are another example of relying on some centralization and trusting these nodes to not become "bad actors". This tech is constantly evolving, let us not throw stones in glass houses.

Yes but with Dark, the bad actor scenarios have been well discussed and resolved with decentralization & a "trust-less" architecture still in place.

If XC goes down this path of a " Dynamically Learning Trust" rating system for nodes, this is flawed and easily exploitable. (Even though the dev has so vaguely said "there is no risk")

I would suggest the dev goes back to rethink his approach.

Very interesting. thank you the added info. I believe a white paper for Xc is on its way, so we'll see then what the full explanation/strategy is.