Quote from: stealth923 on June 02, 2014, 12:44:11 AM

Quote from: Joshuar on June 01, 2014, 11:42:03 PM

Quote from: Propulsion on June 01, 2014, 11:38:13 PM

Quote from: stealth923 on June 01, 2014, 11:17:32 PM

The dev has absolutely no idea. How vague and ambiguous can you be in a response???

As a holder of Darkcoin, I'm very interested in competitors claiming to achieve the same goal.

So far what I've seen from the xc dev when faced with a technical question has been very unsettling.
It really does seem like he is just using persuasive words (Paradigm) to demonstrate the illusion of progress.

Earlier in this thread a member broke the "anonymity" of this coin with 5 minutes examining the block explorer. Which really isn't too surprising considering the dev is not able to use github correctly.

As of right now with the mandatory update, the coin is forked.

This crypto is really all just a hype train. Looking at lolJoshCoin (xc coin) it proves no innovation as a true anonymous cryptocurrency and in my own personal opinion, the dev is a shame making promises such as Visa and Mastercard integration along with the anonymity.

It's a real shame considering someone with prostate cancer is trusting the dev with unconditional support.

After the enormous rise in marketcap for Darkcoin, this weeks flavor of the month is apparently anonymity. Good luck with your investments.

Good read, coins are just trying to ride on Darkcoin's fame by creating false promises...bankcoin,libertycoin,xc..

Hit the nail on the head - If I had $1 for every time the dev used the word multi-path paradigm - id be a rich man....then again who the hell even knows what this is from a technical view.

I have not seen a single technical or in depth deep discussion on anything from this coin - just buzz words - and I dont think the dev is capable of one. Anonymint/eduffield would tear him to shreds.

I feel very sorry for the people who have spent money on this they can't afford to lose.

I've seen on some schematics of the xnodes and how theyll function (big picture style) and what the eventual upgrades will provide. There have been some technical discussions, code was reviewed via teamviewer and confirmed it was different that what the rumors had speculated (original code in other words and not a copy of something else). Hopefully though, what I'd like is an official whitepaper explaining everything on a technical level, which is something that is apparently in the works. Scepticism is good for any new coin, especially those making big claims, what I do know is that the releases have come as promised, tonight release went well, and the fork was corrected with impressive speed by pushing out another wallet update while coordinating with the exchanges etc (was on the freenode, to see it in action). As with all things in crypto, time will tell what happens in the next few weeks/mths. Could be a told you so scenario or devs could certainly come through and silence the critics.