Quote from: bitcoinben on June 03, 2014, 11:06:28 AM

Quote from: ahumanbeingx on June 03, 2014, 10:43:52 AM

Quote from: bitcoinben on June 03, 2014, 10:37:47 AM

Quote from: ahumanbeingx on June 03, 2014, 10:14:25 AM

Quote from: Kire on June 03, 2014, 10:05:51 AM

All XBC team on a new coin! Good work, if this is the same like XBC, means another fraud and another deaqd coin!
Good luck, and to all who will invenst in this coin, BE CAREFULL this theam is not trustworthy!

I know for a fact XBC started as a scam and our current team members joined after the release to try to save and stabilize XBC. They are still working hard to bring new life back into it. Digital Commerce is a separate entity with a trustworthy team dedicated to bringing crypto to more vendors and e-commerce websites.

Interesting. As you know for a fact that XBC was started as a scam, please post the evidence here.

Otherwise, how do we trust you or the DCM team if you are telling lies? Don't state things that you cannot backup or what merit does the claims in the original post have on your intentions for DCM?

Like someone else stated, if the promises are not kept, every member on the DCM team will also receive a negative rating from myself also.

Looking forward to the evidence Grin

I know because XBC had no wallet, website, and the original dev bailed out before our team members stepped in to stabilize it. They are the ones who created the new website and direction for the coin. Any more than that, I would suggest you look into the XBC thread or contact those members directly. Without their support, XBC wouldn't even have a wallet by now.

But your original statement was conveyed to be factual. Where is the evidence? Everything you wrote was subjective to your own personal experience. I thought you had ACTUAL evidence.

From stalking the XBC thread from around the IPO time, XBC had a win/ mac wallet (the issues were not found until the new team had taken over). Does a coin without a website from the minute of launch really make it fraudulent or is this just public expectations (or possibly your own?). Finally, from what I heard, the dev was away on a business trip for two days and everyone freaked out - I wouldn't class this as running away.

Are you not trying to ride on the same success created by the original XBC dev (by doing an exchange IPO) for profit? I'm personally looking forward to the accounting figures to see how much of the IPO actually goes towards development. Because your loose terms could end up making the whole DCM development scammers.

I don't know how I feel about you slandering/ mouthing off about other people when you are now in the public spotlight representing DCM (which is meant to be taken seriously, unless I missed something and this is a joke coin?). Since I am invested in DCM, I don't really feel comfortable by your professionalism. I think the team needs to seriously consider your position.

Sorry for going so indepth, but I'm an academic and I like to not only analyze the coin but also the team behind it.

Seems to me like you're being very anal. The XBC wallet didn't stake and was also vulnerable to attack because it was still accepting PoW. The dev did nothing to fix it and it was left to some of the guys who are working on DCM to sort it out while the old dev got on with his next coin, which has also been abandoned by him as far as I can tell.

By the way I'm nothing to do with DCM, nor have I invested in it yet. I just happen to have been an early investor in XBC so I know the story quite well and have been witness to the hard work of the guys who took over.