Quote from: AlexGR on June 04, 2014, 11:22:17 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 04, 2014, 11:13:06 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on June 04, 2014, 11:05:06 PM

Quote from: battbot on June 04, 2014, 10:25:49 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on June 04, 2014, 10:16:11 PM

Trust me when I say media attention is not really desirable while the "nodes-can-steal-money" issue remains.

Atcsecure already said dynamic trust system will prevent bad actors from stealing. Are you more or as qualified as him to present an argument opposing this? If so, let's hear it. Because all I've seen you do is offer up ungrounded "thesis statements" with no supporting arguments. Not trying to troll, but I'd like to see a solid argument of why you oppose atcsecures method. Until then, nothing you say holds any water.

Operative word: will.

Which means, as it is right now, with nodes being able to steal money, you don't want much attention because it can instantly snap the other way around to ...negative attention. Let's see the fix first...

You seem to spend most of your time on the DRK thread.. What a shock.. Apols in advance for giving you some competition.

I've given the exact same advice regarding DRK marketing in the past. Finish the product, market later. No need to have broken functionality trigger people "ohhh this is broken" type of stuff.

I agree with this too.... I think letting the polished product speak for itself. The price of the coin will take care of itself.