It's interesting that you lash out at others for making claims about closed source (for now) code, then turn around and do the exact same thing, just with a different slant.
I can't figure out what you're saying here. Is the idea that I can't say anything at all about something thats closed?
Thats not my position at all. My position is that that a closed source cryptographic currency is inherently centralized (via control of the source), and that experience suggests that most such systems are snake oil (they don't deliver the things they claim to) if not being outright trojans. Indeed, you can't tell maybe it's actually great, but great things usually don't need to hide in the shadows. The safe assumption is that they're not great at all.
Ok Greg, this thread has your attention, good.
Darkcoin is open source except for the anonymity for now.
https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin/commits/forkfixLook in the altcoin section. Notice the flavor of the month? This is because of Darkcoin. If it was open sourced from the get go, it would never stand a chance.
When Darkcoin is completed, it will be vetted by a respected Developer and if no issues are found open sourced.
You created coinjoin. Darkcoin is created from coinjoin. Would you be interested in vetting the code?