Quote from: noSlave on June 08, 2014, 04:57:54 AM

Quote from: Muhammed Zakir on June 08, 2014, 04:55:49 AM

Quote from: Este Nuno on June 07, 2014, 04:48:09 PM

I do think it's an issue and to be honest I'm not particularly impressed with Ghash's response, or lack there of.

Especially when you compare it to the quick and effective response of BTC Guild when they were in the 40% bracket.

Some people have speculated that Ghash has mining power that totals above 50% already but their mining it off pool in order to avoid attention. I'm not saying that's true, but if they did end up with over 50% of the hashing power that would seem like it would be the most rational thing to do economically speaking(if and only if the public had no knowledge of it happening).

>50% attacks are real and should be taken seriously by the community. Even the threat of one is enough to seriously harm bitcoin in the eyes of the public. I don't even want to imagine what sort spin these modern media companies would put on it.

I don't even mine in Ghash.io . IMO its not very good site, there are a lot better sites with great support than Ghash.io .
Kindly,
Muhammed Zakhir

jep, and the problem is, that Ghash.io own the hardware. There aren't so miner real miners. Most is done by themself

There are a lot of miners with hardware pointed at ghash. They provide good stats and the pool is more profitable. It stands to reason that more people would use them.