Quote from: Geenstijl on June 09, 2014, 11:39:56 AM

Quote from: merk475 on June 09, 2014, 11:32:23 AM

Quote from: Geenstijl on June 09, 2014, 11:27:54 AM

Perfect job. Ensure your investors that you're prepared to intervene but do not give too much details. IPO only 5 days old and all these investors who are complaining only care about one thing: quick profits.

I beleive in this coin longterm, you got a really nice budget to work with and in worst case scenario you could intervene in the market. That gives me more insurance than any other coin out there in the market.

In the last days DCM really has become the toy of the speculators, no fundamentals whatsoever.

I'm reading through your message, and it sounds like you are complimenting the dev team, and the work they are doing, and even the coin. But then your last line confuses me, because it sounds like a complete dis on the coin. Was this your intention? If not, please explain what you meant....

This coin was IPO'd 5 days ago at 0.0001. Yesterday the price fell to 0.000025... This is completely irrational. This coin has an actual budget which is transparent and would even be used to cover pricedrops in the market. Lets say the devs are willing to use quarter of it. That would mean the price could never drop below 0,000025.. So at that price the maximum chance for loss is 0% while the upwards potential is 1000's of %'s. Other coins dont have Dev teams that have budgets to intervene. Most of them the dev's are not even known.

The fact that the price fell to a quarter of the IPO price is just a consequence of sheople behaviour. They like all Abandon ship without realizing that there is actually a safety net in this coin.

So pure selling on the basis of price-trend, instead of looking at the quality of the coin.

Ah......gotcha. You were talking about traders and not the coin. I thought so, but just wanted to make sure.