Quote from: Bumberchute on June 09, 2014, 04:43:29 PM

Quote from: atleticofa on June 09, 2014, 04:23:13 PM

Quote from: djm34 on June 09, 2014, 04:20:48 PM

Quote from: atleticofa on June 09, 2014, 03:56:50 PM

Quote from: Bumberchute on June 09, 2014, 03:39:15 PM

I would not mine this coin if there was not block reward voting. Other coins have chatting too, not true p2p chatting, but to the end user it looks similar. The block reward voting is a big reason why I like Talkcoin.

So maybe should be less radical voting? Like using some average beetwen the old votes and the last one?

Some kind of Gravity well but for the reward..

Build something like an IP check to make sure that no other vote can occurs from the same IP, that would block part of the cheating.

Dev said: "One-person-multi-votes" will be implemented, this is will reduce dumping and preserve a good price and it will promote investment.

I think he proposed just the opposite, that everybody can vote all times that he wants?

It would likely be much easier to allow people to vote as much as they want than to implement some IP checking, but would this be better for the democracy?

As it is now you can vote many times if you run many wallets, this at least is a deterrent to casting multiple votes. But allowing multiple votes from one wallet I think is back-peddling, and a mistake.

If you must allow multi-voting for technical reasons, at least make each additional vote cost 100% more than the last...

I don't see how multi-vote is more of the mistake than voting from several wallet.
This is as equally stupid in my opinion.
But don't worry, as far as I am concerned I have no intention to spend all my coin in voting.
So will these coins be destroyed as suggested ? (if not I understand perfectly the interest of dev in allowing multi-vote for everybody Grin

)