Quote from: luke997 on June 10, 2014, 07:24:10 PM

Quote from: humanitee on June 10, 2014, 07:18:47 PM

Quote from: mikemikemike on June 05, 2014, 07:53:07 PM

Maybe. But without any big news you'll be fighting 0.01 in a matter of days. There is no argument for that. I've posted the evidence, and it is completely irrefutable. The same thing happened with BTC, everyone thought 800 was the bottom, then 700, then 600, while the professionals called it as soon as soon as the double top appeared at 400. If you guys don't want to be told whats going to happen that's your problem. I'm going to enjoy checking up on this thread and watching all you shills turn on this project and start blaming the whales.

Don't say you wern't warned.

Enjoy.

lololol
mike^3, where you at!?

I was going to say the same... Slapper got all these guys figured out...
All those "friendly financial advisors" always have their own agenda - i.e. get you panic sell/buy.
Don't know why Foolio got fooled with it Wink

Most decent I would say is Toknormal, 2 out of 3 times his analysis is ok, especially short term, and rather observational than suggestive, also admits when he is/was wrong...

Yeah, because I didn't presume to know his intentions were manipulative and took what he said in good faith, that means I was "fooled". Yep. They don't call me foolio for nothin'! Or... you could be as wrong about him as he may be about where the price is heading.

Tok's analysis is good, I agree. It's much appreciated. I appreciate Mike's input very much as well. IceBucket's too, and anyone who takes the their time out to share their honest opinion. The way I see it is you really never know someone's intentions... admittedly in some cases it's pretty obvious that they troll or FUD, not in Mike's.

This is what I see: when someone says something that you don't really like, then it's tempting to cast aspersions toward their character, and project malign intentions onto them. Bingo?