Quote from: eMansipater on March 26, 2011, 07:09:44 AM

@FreeMoney we'll have to see

@ryepdx Thx netizen! @CryptikEnigma Don't you mean someone within a particular government did? No one who sets policy I live under has, to my knowledge. But I'm not really here to defend anyone or anything, except BitCoin.

Quote from: creighto on March 26, 2011, 05:34:02 AM

Quote from: eMansipater on March 26, 2011, 03:21:03 AM

And for anyone else out there who thinks anarchism leaves something to be desired--stick around! You're not the only one. We need you because the way bitcoin actually succeeds is not as some fringe project of the libertarian community (no offense to the hundreds of toes I just stepped on there

) but as a truly world-changing technology that encompasses people from many different points of view. Bitcoin won't succeed unless non-anarchists accept it and that's pretty much that.

You were doing fine until you conflated anarchism and libertarianism.

It's true, the text does sort of lump them in together despite their clear differences. But combined what percentage of the planet's political spectrum do they represent? What I mean to say is that bitcoin as a technology needs to be bigger than either or both. The community needs to be whoever cares about the technology, whether they match the world's spectrum perfectly or not--but it's good for newcomers to clearly understand they are welcome in it even if neither term is homebase.

Regarding imaginary lines on a map--that I can get behind. Bitcoin and other borderless realities are the way of the future!

after reading it all I conclude that it has to do with the political form of every country whether it's economic or otherwise because every country has different thoughts and also different rights we can not demand every country should be the same but which one wants to legalize or not it depends on the policies of each country because the risk of all is borne by those who give policy.