Quote from: AlexGR on June 12, 2014, 03:16:09 PM

Quote from: humanitee on June 12, 2014, 03:09:43 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on June 12, 2014, 03:05:54 PM

A monetary system that can't be trusted for its primary function (movement of money) is inherently problematic.

The anonymity part for DRK and the trust issue is more like percentages. If you DarkSend the money 5 times, and a bad actor controls like 30% of the network, it's like 0.3 x 0.3 x 0.3 x 0.3 x 0.3 = 0.25% => 99.75% that he'll miss the money flow. You play with probabilities. As you do when you use an IP obfuscation network that might reveal you anyway, whether you use DRK, or MRO.

DRK still doesn't handle change correctly though, which makes it super flawed at the moment (unless I missed the implementation of change denomination pools).

RC4+ IIRC.

I knew it was coming, but currently it's not there. We can't act completely superior if we aren't completely superior. Wink

What good is DRK if you can't spend your change?

I believe chaeplin showed earlier that XC suffers from the same problem, I'd need to revisit his post but it appeared that way.