Quote from: multi-pool.eu on June 15, 2014, 09:07:47 PM

Please don't spam the thread with your pool unless you have some news about it like adding services or changing fee.

Also your claim in this post is ridicilous:

Quote from: multi-pool.eu on June 13, 2014, 08:32:25 AM

Why we don't help karma?

We are not a pool, unlike many others (ex. pools on your signature), who came on karma only now, when it is convenient.
We are on karma from the beginning and we have always supported and helped.
We were asked to close the ringup and we said no to help users.

Read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=447657.msg4930699#msg4930699
We help, support and mining karma from February, but despite that some people think that we are untrusted and the devs don't want add us the pool list.

This is for help karma?

I run the blockexplorer and a couple of seed nodes now because the old devs took down their servers. I only created pools because you were hurting the network by insisting on just adding more users even if you were at 92% !!!!!!!! of the global hash rate. that was back in late april that i launched a p2pool... now that asic are lose you are no longer a thread to the network but your previous actions still make me distrust you.

Also could you please answer my questions from before...

Quote from: altcoingood on June 13, 2014, 08:48:54 AM

Why you are not helping karma? It's just the simple facts. Your pool was >51% consistently for months and when it grew to 92% you still did not want to help spread the hash out. Just facts.

edit: personally i think your pool should be left on the list and the list should be updated with hashrates and i have voiced that opinion (just so you know i am for full disclosure).

i think the pool is off the list because you did not try to help out the community (that is we really needed you to announce that miners should mine somewhere else because of 51% and the fact that no investor will invest in a coin where 92% of the transactions are validated by the same entity.. which you were unwilling to do...your solution was to add another stratum to your pool (makes no sense, does not help validate transactions by multiple entities, does not mitigate 51%))...

Does this really help karma?

You were actively and willingly destroying the stability of the infrastructure and integrity of the transactions because of some "i came here first"-claim. Childish behaviour and now you spam this thread without even trying to answer any questions or debate the merits of your pool. *sigh*

here are some articles that highlight why >51% pools are a big problem:

http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/06/bitcoin-security-guarantee-shattered-by-anonymous-miner-with-51-network-power/

http://hackingdistributed.com/2014/06/13/time-for-a-hard-bitcoin-fork/