Quote from: boumalo on June 13, 2014, 04:11:42 PM

Quote from: makiyo_love on June 13, 2014, 03:55:18 PM

According to Charlie Shrem, several govt agencies are monitoring here.

Of course they are what do you expect?

They are monitoring automatically and with agents; you can consider it is their job, it depends how they monitor and what is the purpose

Dear federal agents,

Go check out Pete Hendrickson's book. I know your fellow bureaucrats have said it's full of lies, but have they identified any of those lies? They pretended to. The book says that "wages" is a legal term that does NOT describe what most people get for their work, and therefore the tax on "wages" does not apply to what most people get for their work. Your fellow bureaucrats pretended this was a lie by altering it to: "Wages are not taxable."

Now, take a few minutes to figure out why they would alter what the book says in order to reverse its meaning and then call it a lie. If it interests you enough, then go read the rest of the book for yourself so you can uncover all the other lies your fellow bureaucrats have invented to try to maintain the gravy train you're all riding.

And watch out, because the conclusion kind of sucks for you: As a federal agent, you are in the small group of people who actually do owe the tax, because what you get for working DOES fit the legal definition of "wages". But you can always quit!