Quote from: roushonul on June 14, 2014, 04:59:36 AM

Quote from: cryptotrain-net on June 14, 2014, 04:40:57 AM

Just a little side note for everybody else, If you read the wall of text above, you will then realise that multipooled mining is not exactly the same as single pool mining, that is why when you try to compare your earnings based off a daily cut, they will never compete, but if you calculate them based of a weekly cut, I feel you will be pleasantly surprised.

I am putting a lot of effort into this pool to ensure that the coding if of the highest standard and so are the people that I working in conjunction with.

If people have a little faith then I can assure you they will have great success with the pool! This pool is not a simple setup and run, it has been hand made from the bottom up.

Hi
Will u consider adding "Groestl" algo. I am killing it right now lol. miners who moaned over huge power consumption of r9 290 and less hash in x11 its thing for them. My r9 290 hashing 13+ Mh/s(no overclock) and 280x doing 11+ Mh/s. So my single r9 290 is basically far greater hashing power combine of 4 750ti as 750ti hash 3 Mh/s in this algo. so here one r9 290=4 750ti. Not know present speed of 750ti on it but last I check I get only 2.5 Mh/s though they list it as 3 Mh/s. And it takes even less power than x11.

Thanks
Rony

Hey Rony, I will look into it for sure.

Keep in mind, Groestl has a different comparison to x11, You cannot compare algos that easily.
If you try your 290x on x11 with the configurations used here https://docs.zoho.com/sheet/published.do?rid=12cbm2fe8ce55abb2476daa0f8c576b442d40&mode=html You will probably find more profitability.
Note, the hashrates listed in that document are not based on the LTCrabbit or lasybear sgminer kernels. So multiply them by 1.40 for an estimated hashrate speed.

Keep in mind also the profitability isn't in the hashing power of an algorithm, it's in the value of its coins.