Quote from: fourdegrees11 on June 14, 2014, 05:26:40 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 14, 2014, 05:15:15 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 05:08:55 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 14, 2014, 05:05:20 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 05:03:08 PM

SO Chaeplin couldn't prove any thing so he tries to stir up the debate with non-trivial information.

Lets ALL BE CLEAR - PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL SENDERS ADDRESS or STFU!!!!!

Can you deny this ?
Is not single entity ?

This is your a Xnode address.

So that was REV1 code, we are now REV1.5, I posted the transaction details yesterday for testing... get with the program

I dont get all the chaeplin compliments, the guy is clearly not capable of proving anything and just wants to stir things up..

As for his apparent lack of grasp for the English language, I suggest a few of you read his posts on the DRK thread, he seems to have very few problems there...

chaeplin you cannot work out the sender address, just admit it and stop losing whatever credibility you may have left...

This.

He continuously blows off what ATCsecure says and then posts the same garbage. How is this helping?

^ this. anyone complimenting chaeplin needs to see all his repeat spams in both DRK and XC Uncensored threads of issues that have already been properly answered by atcsecure. Chaeplin is not trying to help XC but trying to spread FUD. That much is clear.