Quote from: mr_random on June 14, 2014, 05:51:49 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 14, 2014, 05:15:15 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 05:08:55 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 14, 2014, 05:05:20 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 05:03:08 PM

SO Chaeplin couldn't prove any thing so he tries to stir up the debate with non-trivial information.

Lets ALL BE CLEAR - PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL SENDERS ADDRESS or STFU!!!!!

Can you deny this ?
Is not single entity ?

This is your a Xnode address.

So that was REV1 code, we are now REV1.5, I posted the transaction details yesterday for testing... get with the program

I dont get all the chaeplin compliments, the guy is clearly not capable of proving anything and just wants to stir things up..

As for his apparent lack of grasp for the English language, I suggest a few of you read his posts on the DRK thread, he seems to have very few problems there...

chaeplin you cannot work out the sender address, just admit it and stop losing whatever credibility you may have left...

Chaeplin is actually a very sneaky and cunning individual.

He posts irrelevant shit and acts like he doesn't understand. But he knows exactly wtf he is doing.

Why the fuck he keeps harping back to old versions of XC is beyond me. He's a FUDster with technical knowledge - the worst kind, because only a handful of regular posters understand the protocol well enough to challenge him.

Atcsecure has posted the challenge for the newest version of XC. By all means anyone is invited to try and crack it.

Winner winner of the steak dinner.