Quote from: whatdidshedo on June 14, 2014, 09:05:05 PM

Quote from: busoni on June 14, 2014, 09:03:54 PM

Quote from: Swag on June 14, 2014, 08:59:27 PM

Quote from: busoni on June 14, 2014, 08:55:36 PM

Quote from: Swag on June 14, 2014, 08:47:33 PM

Quote from: busoni on June 14, 2014, 08:20:32 PM

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics?
MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity.

MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system.

What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function.

The most likely way would be for them to push an update to adjust the reward. As I said, we did not find evidence of a hidden premine currently in existence. What legitimate explanation for this obviously deliberate adjustment to the variables do you have?

Right on , respect

I don't agree with you busoni. I believe there is a concern but PoW is legit in their code. Also MAX_MONEY can be changed on any update on any coin which makes this argument invalid. Currently the coin will produce the correct amount of coins. This is FUD