Quote from: jakiman on June 14, 2014, 10:46:12 PM

Quote from: busoni on June 14, 2014, 10:30:57 PM

We have recently raised our reviewing standards to look for more than just trojans and security exploits. SC and CINNI were not subjected to that kind of scrutiny. We will investigate them, though. And if it turns out that they are like SuperCoin and deliberately inserted those values, then we might have a problem. I cannot comment on them at this point, since we have not looked over the code yet for things like this.

We are attempting to raise the bar on the quality of the coins we list. We are well aware that this stance will be met with some opposition, particularly when a popular coin is rejected, but we are willing to take the heat for that. The idle pursuit of volume was never the intention behind Poloniex.

Why don't you create a new thread first saying you will de-list CINNI & SILKCOIN also before doing a full investigation like you did with supercoin?
I actually find it good to know that you guys check the code. That's great. But at least admit that maybe you jumped the gun a little for this one.

so pretty much all three of these coins are just the same with small differences and are all a scam

I would say remove Silkcoin cinni and super asap as these are basically pyramid schemes and very obvious ones at that with code manipulation...changing the wallet before a PnD so ppl lose their coins in transactions if they did not upgrade. I bet they are wormholing the lost coins as well.