Quote from: provenceday on June 15, 2014, 01:03:33 AM

Quote from: busoni on June 15, 2014, 12:48:11 AM

Quote from: provenceday on June 15, 2014, 12:10:10 AM

can i aks my BTC donation back in the Hacker event?

Grin

busoni you are a honest guy, i like you.

hope you can handle this tough thing correctly.

thanks

You actually can, I don't hold people to that.

It is pertinent that the coin was hard forked to change the maximum supply. We have not examined all the changes made, but this may strengthen the case for the MAX_MONEY issue being negligence rather than laying the foundation for a nefarious plan. Nevertheless, the variable could have been deliberately left unchanged for the same reasons, and in any case, it indicates sloppy coding that opens the coin up to, for example, a much larger double spend attack. We're going to look into this further, but an apology may be in order for not coming to dev privately first.

There is also the issue of the anon implementation proposed, which even by the dev's admission is highly vulnerable to "cheating." I would never list a coin that relied on the honesty of people operating a mixing pool. It would be trivial for them to steal coins and impossible to prove that they had done so.

i do hope supercoin dev can communicate with you directly. but he is sleep now.

i hope you can handle this correctly.

about the cheating node, it seems XC coin and Darkcoin also has similar issues, Please check this. XC coin use Xnode, in first stage its also have some cheating problem. dark coin use masternode which also not a 100% safeway. Although Bitcoin survive the 51% attack several days ago.

busoni, my friend, Please think this again or wait for the Supercoin dev give your a reply later, no need to make a rush decision.

thank you very much. i will keep Support Poloniex.

busoni, my friend where are you? Please do something.