Quote from: bitrap on June 15, 2014, 01:55:48 AM

All we know for sure is that Polo went with the MAX_MONEY line as the headline reason to reject this coin, which has been debunked. The OP ends with this:

Quote from: busoni on June 14, 2014, 08:20:32 PM

We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin.

The anon feature of the wallet was just released a few hours ago and is in it's alpha stage, so it's not even an official feature yet.

So what's left? Code copying? I'm no programmer myself but as far as I know, every programmer "borrows" code.

I'm sure busoni is a great guy, but it's starting to smell like some back peddling in here.

another fud? someone does not understand what MAX_MONEY means and start to reject coins? What a retard. Anon feature just released? can you tell me how many coins have that feature? how many promised and unable to deliver? your comments made me laugh.