Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 16, 2014, 03:55:18 AM

Quote from: stealth923 on June 16, 2014, 03:54:20 AM

Quote from: evtrmm on June 16, 2014, 03:47:16 AM

Quote from: stealth923 on June 16, 2014, 03:40:11 AM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 16, 2014, 03:36:49 AM

Quote from: stealth923 on June 16, 2014, 03:34:06 AM

So what you are saying is you are going to throw the existing XNode architecture out the window and use Multi-Sig instead of transferring the ACTUAL coins through the mixers. What Darkcoin has and is already functional.

So basically this means that XC architecture 1.5 is STILL flawed and there is bad actor scenario's where coins can be stolen.

ya... as if DRk is completely working now right? RC3 still isnt' out where the masternode actually can pay the operators and not fork like mad. Why don't you come back when DRK is actually fully working first...?

DRK multi-sig IS working...only masternode payments. And before you say fork...XC had to be check-pointed and a new wallet released a few weeks ago from an unplanned fork!

Just to highlight to investors - everyone has been screaming that XC is flawed and now after all this development the Dev announces that he is going to COPY darkcoin's multi-sig architecture to get around the bad actor and coin stealing problem........what a

waste of time...

So what your saying is XC will copy #dorks closed source code? I see. Huh

Key word: ARCHITECTURE..not code, learn to READ..essentially the Dev has now realised his is flawed and now needs to make an XNode the SAME as a Masternode in Darkcoin.

Did you say the same thing about DRK masternode RC3 trying to go fix their payment and forking issue?

DRK architecture is so closed source... you have not a single idea of what DRK really is doing... how can you say anything about architecture when you don't know yourself?

I have stealth923 on ignore, but nothing is changing in the XNODE architect and nor is it flawed. It is the foundation for the XC Platform.