Quote from: timerland on June 16, 2014, 05:21:28 PM

Quote from: supercointeam on June 16, 2014, 04:29:02 PM

Quote from: fireinyourhole on June 16, 2014, 04:20:09 PM

Quote from: sovie on June 16, 2014, 12:58:25 PM

wat eva people can read for themselves
i;ve wasted enough time already
have fun

gtfo noob.

Dev what is status with busoni

I have not got any answer from him, still.

Although Busoni issued an apology (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7319548#msg7319548), it is not enough. They need to give a conclusion of their investigation: is Supercoin good or bad, do they find any issues, if at all? If no issues or no major issues, and since Supercoin was the first in voting list, they should add it to Poloniex, this is the only way they can clear all their mistakes.

Their debacle caused many investors to lose money, we demand an explanation from them on the conclusion of their investigation of supercoin!

But now I don't see any conclusions, and they have kept the title of that thread ("Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.0), in a very misleading way. This title is translated to "We have rejected a bad coin", but what is bad? They did not or can not say anything (because Supercoin is a great coin!).

Before this is done, I can't see Busoni's apology is sincere at all. We demand Poloniex give a clear explanation on it!

Busoni, you are brave enough to post your thread ("Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.0), but no courage to reply the questions above??