Quote from: MajidBC on June 17, 2014, 08:55:28 AM

Quote from: JJPasak on June 17, 2014, 07:44:38 AM

Quote from: MajidBC on June 17, 2014, 07:27:08 AM

What's your proof? When you accuse someone to a crime you should provide evidence. Do you know the Dev? Do you see any problem in the OP? You just shout and then run away?

They use the same shortcut and same name of an existing coin, they even know about that. I don't know the dev, but I see he either does 0 research or he gives 0 fucks, in both cases I don't want this coin.

"Whitepaper, anonymous, multipool....." He just put up all hype words together, I can do that too.

When you state your reasons, we can talk about them and the dev will have a chance to defend himself/herself. Actually, I agree about the name and the ticker part. I don't see any reason to use another coin name for your new coin.

I am open to changing the name of the coin - the other name discussed was QuantaCoin with a ticker QTC. However, the coin Quantum currently isn't using any of the domains we want and it is only available or exchanged on 1 place where it is steadily dying. For now we will stick with the name Quantum - I think it sounds noticeably better then QuantaCoin. Should we have the need to change it in the future for whatever the reason we definitely will.

However, I am confused how this makes us a scam.