Quote from: TizeN85 on June 17, 2014, 10:07:28 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 09:59:35 AM

Quote from: JohnJoule on June 17, 2014, 09:30:20 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 09:14:53 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 17, 2014, 08:18:08 AM

Hmm, Algo looks normal to me, it should work with this miner:

https://github.com/kR105/cgminer-alt

or

http://www.blakecoin.org/cgminer-3.7-blake256.tar.gz

You should have a look here @ first post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=306894.0 (look at Pools/cgminer)

You can give it a try @ https://sfr.suprnova.cc you should see accepted shares, if not, quit mining and I'll have to tweak further, I'm currently out and cannot access my rigs for testing :-/

I get accepted shares but the blocks found are rejected.. I cannot see a different block structure at first sight, searching for a difference now

Saffroncoind uses a different Blake algorithm than Blake coin. There exists Blake and Blake-2.

There is no GPU miner released for Saffroncoin's Blake algo, but judging by the difficulty (52), there might be a GPU miner (or a botnet) on it.

I think I've got the Algo right, it seems to be a problem with final block creation, there might be some extra information or a different block header which I'm missing.. Maybe one of the devs has a tip for me, currently I cannot find the difference

Someone have said that's the block height if i'm right

Block Height is calculated automatically as far as I see.. Are there any special stratum versions for this coin ? Maybe I can look there