Quote from: zzzman20 on June 17, 2014, 10:07:40 PM

Quote from: busoni on June 15, 2014, 06:06:28 AM

I would like to point out that I did not personally review the code, as many people seem to think. The person who did has very high standards and was not thrilled with what he saw, and he was overzealous in his criticisms. When I made this post, I firmly believed that the maximum supply was inflated. My intention with going public before contacting the devs was to make sure they did not have a chance to cover up the mistake or take advantage of the issue.

It is my responsibility to ensure that these issues are addressed correctly, so no fingers should be pointed anywhere but at me. I see now that I should have had another reviewer confirm the findings, and investigated sufficiently to make sure I understood all of the code myself before proceeding. I apologize for this misstep. There are still some parts of the code we're concerned about, so our investigations will continue, and I will talk to the devs privately about the anon feature.

This whole raising the standards for coins thing is in an early stage, and we are constantly improving our process. We believe strongly in integrity and transparency, and it has always been my intention to use Poloniex's position to improve the quality of crypto.

I respect an exchange operator who has this attitude, it's very refreshing and rare. Busoni has always shown a high level of integrity and it gives me high faith and confidence in Poloniex. His commitment to repay everyone who lost money when the website got hacked months ago, and taking measures that it can never happens again by keeping funds in cold storage and constantly encouraging all members to use 2FA and secure passwords, Busoni has shown himself and the Polo team to be class acts.

i know the hacker event, i also donate for them, but they do make a big mistake on this Supercoin.