Quote from: Spondoolies-Tech on June 17, 2014, 10:35:46 PM

Quote from: jimmothy on June 17, 2014, 10:27:04 PM

Quote from: Spondoolies-Tech on June 17, 2014, 10:20:37 PM

You're clueless, on both of the statement you made.
Quick question: Did you read the IPO terms ?

Quick answer: I skimmed through it. Why?

Which statements?

Quote from: DataTankMining on June 17, 2014, 11:26:20 AM

... First payments are expected when the initial hardware is deployed, 3-6 months after successful fund raising ...

Quote from: jimmothy on June 17, 2014, 10:27:04 PM

I'll admit that I don't know how you can build a 1MW DC for less than $200k.

But how does that change the fact that datatank is offering $0.93/gh and $0.025/kwh where as you are offering $0.85/gh and ~$0.25/kwh starting 3 months later?

Apples and Oranges. The electricity cost is simply the locale. Fill a DT with RockerBox and you'll get much, much better numbers.
And as I've explained, you can get much, much, much, much better numbers with other cheap deployments methods.

Edit: And on a serious note. The affiliation between AC DT and AM is very loose. It was stated in the IPO for one reason only, get all AM fan boys buy another stock. Cynical but effective move. Working as we can see.

Looks like I jumped the gun on the starting date.

Regardless the hosting cost is the real killer. $0.025/kwh has to be the best I've heard.

And I do hope you offer your chips at a reasonable price so these tanks can be filled with even more hashing power. As you said the connection with AM is weak but that is not why I am interested. I only care about the numbers not which companies chips will be used. I don't have access to $0.025/kwh and neither do most people and the fact that you only need to buy 18GH/s to get industrial level electricity rates makes the offer very attractive.