Quote from: AlexGR on June 18, 2014, 10:08:50 AM

Quote from: coinzcoinzcoinz on June 18, 2014, 09:36:05 AM

Quote from: AlexGR on June 18, 2014, 09:32:07 AM

Quote from: coinzcoinzcoinz on June 18, 2014, 09:28:53 AM

I am hoping Evan will announce details of further features to achieve further anonimity for RC4 after Friday's hardfork.

But they are announced. We know what to expect in RC4 (anon upgrade), even if we don't know the specifics.

Some specifics would be nice, although he probably has his reasons not to share. He probably doesn't want *NAMEOFSCAM* to steal even more features from us.

I'm just worried of the small possibility that he might not know how to achieve further anonimity yet and therefore can't share any details. This is why specifics would be nice to rule out this possibility. Let's just say I invested big in February and am in it with >90% of net worth so I have a lot on the line

Actually he has already given it out, but you have to assemble it from the past posts:

Quote from: eduffield on May 19, 2014, 01:58:55 PM

I have 2 possible solutions to evaluate for V2 of darksend (ring signatures and encrypted system where the users themselves do the joining relayed through the masternodes.) . Both of these make the masternodes unaware of who is sending money to whom, so centralization isn't an issue at that point.

Quote from: eduffield on May 22, 2014, 12:23:25 AM

I've had some substantial progress on DarkSend and have figured out how to make our existing system as secure as ring signatures. Vastly improved security, no bloat (from the ring signatures) and without actually having to trust new cryptography (it hasn't been extensively tested like what DarkSend uses) . So I think it'll give us a HUGE advantage in the coming months. More to come soon, I'm going to start implementing this tomorrow. Grin

Quote from: eduffield on April 28, 2014, 12:56:11 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on April 28, 2014, 10:01:26 AM

I think it was mentioned, in the discussion between evan/anonymint that by darksending it multiple times through a number of nodes it reduces the bad-actor probabilities to a statistically safe degree to solve the issue that the darksend node knows who sends what.

I think I have a better solution than that, I want to turn the masternodes into I2P relays for darkcoin. So your client will pick one when you start, then relay any messages through that one. It encrypts all of the traffic, removes the connection between IP and address and it the blockchain is still a complete fog. Plus it'll be a private I2P, so it'll be super fast. Masternodes are going to be awesome Grin

...and yes, some of these ideas are being pursued right now by other coins.

Thanks!