Quote from: fukukami on June 18, 2014, 03:31:52 PM

Quote from: othe on June 18, 2014, 11:53:24 AM

Thanks for stealing our hard work again without giving credits to Wozz and Paybee.

https://github.com/paybee/electrum-vert

This is where all the hard work was done but you forked the ltc electrum and just copy pasted it over so no one sees its from the electrum-vert github, nice work.
Wozz did the main work on this, writing all the KGW stuff in python etc.

https[Suspicious link removed]/blob/master/lib/blockchain.py

Code:

try:
   from vtc_scrypt import getPoWHash
except ImportError:
   print_msg("Warning: vtc_scrypt not available, using fallback")
   from scrypt import scrypt_2048_1_1_80 as getPoWHash

https://github.com/paybee/electrum-vert/blob/master/lib/blockchain.py

Code:

try:
   from vtc_scrypt import getPoWHash
except ImportError:
   print_msg("Warning: vtc_scrypt not available, using fallback")
   from scrypt import scrypt_N_1_1_80 as getPoWHash

funny that you didn't even make a working scrypt execoin module for python, so this electrum will stop working when execoin nfactor changes...

PS: The version you use has still bugs left thats why it wasnt really published.
PS2: We are all sooo impressed by the hard working execoin dev.......

Dear othe!

I was not going to steal anyone's credit and hard work. That was just an accidental error during rebase. Thing is, commits in electrum-vert are a bit messy to my liking, so I've decided to recommit only KGW modifications by wozz.
So I'm really sorry I made this to wozz, and I greatly apologize. This is the fix in a repo for that (commit 06612afd5e246628095b518fc9dd83ee21ad2f07)
And as far as I can see out of commit history, paybee did nothing in KGW code except mergin PRs (https://github.com/paybee/electrum-vert/pull/1). If I'm wrong, please correct me, so I should be able to credit him too.

Take a note that my code is based on pooler's electrum-ltc and not on electrum-vert, as you can clearly see here at commit c7dcf10109a6160f9692c9eb264e158a8456267d.
Also, I've modified pooler's scrypt to add support of current N in execoin. Function is called scrypt_2048_1_1_80 that will be changed with another function soon, and will be aware of N change schedule, but in the meantime I use vtc_scrypt (it's nothing wrong with using open source pypi package, rigth?), that will also be changed to exe_scrypt soon, so current implementation will be left only as a fallback.

Anyway, there is at least a year till N in execoin will change, and creating of new function is quick, so don't worry about that.
P.S. Electum-vert has not been updated since May 26. Hasn't it been published yet because of bugs? I bet they still have confirmations bug, that is magically fixed in me code.

I've fixed some of the bugs discovered during testing phase, if you would find more in electrum-exe - your bug reports will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you fukukami for your hard work.
Othe - don't you really think that there are no developers in this world besides vertcoin's ones?
And special thanks to Eoinoc for clarifying possible legal issues to fluffyponyza for defamation of character here http://www.reddit.com/r/Execoin/comments/28gbrn/psa_electrumexe_steals_code_without_attributing/