Quote from: othe on June 18, 2014, 12:20:26 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=491058.msg7378593#msg7378593
http://www.reddit.com/r/Execoin/comments/28gbrn/psa_electrumexe_steals_code_without_attributing/

Execoin did it again, awesome.

Quote from: fukukami on June 19, 2014, 12:27:33 AM

Quote from: othe on June 18, 2014, 11:49:38 PM

1) No your code doesn't magically fix confirmation bugs, you are too stupid to use electrum-vert.
2) Yes there are are enough good developers out there - they just aren't on execoin. You did absolutely nothing so far except copying code by others.
3) I am not even going to comment the sueing shit from you code stealing fags, feel free to sue me too for speaking out the truth.
4) Stop writing me PMs to clear this in private, we wont.

If it doesn't, you are welcome to submit bug report. But it does, and you are not going to do that anyway, because I bet you can't even describe curcumstances that introduces this bug. And as you said "bugs", you probably don't even undertand what I was talking about.

Quote

Stop writing me PMs to clear this in private, we wont.

You said that yourself. You want to make a grand event from little, now wilingly fixed mistake.
What is it if not black PR?

Are you really so jealous because I've did it first?
And that's how you roll. Rudeness and harshness to polite responses and no proofs of your accusations.
Just so you know, that's doesn't make Vertcoin look cooler and vertcoin devs smarter. Really.

Not to say this is totally not is the spirit of open source culture.
If you don't want anyone to even see your code, why do you make it public in a first place?

Also, you totally ignored post by execoin that your paper wallet is broken and you prodly put "Copyright by Vertcoin team" like you did everything yourself, but totally forgot about bitaddress.org. Or was this intentional?
Quick to blame anyone else of your own sins?

Quote from: execoin on June 10, 2014, 03:27:05 AM

As for wallets. Let's compare https://paperwallet.vertcoin.org, http[Suspicious link removed]coin.net and https://www.bitaddress.org
1. Vertcoin developers replaced copyrights of the original developers and (likely, but we are not 100% sure) replaced the donation address by their own.
2. Last tab -'Wallet details' - being used for conversion between key and address formats. Try Qt8yngFMGxpN5mYZ5S3HaorrcTGVTLAf34kVfAPBDJ1tfQyi29t6 on http[Suspicious link removed]coin.net (valid Execoin private key, corresponding address ETeXsJnN87MyPGEHaM1VH2wgk8z19PicVq) and WZbtDqm5aFX6yyXyKQbjMhqWQomt1iXevwyMxuRTCSKkADEtP756 on https://paperwallet.vertcoin.org (valid Vertcoin private key, corresponding address Vt1mjajspSTKDHQdWZHK9qN4e1VpYiKRXx). Vertcoin's converter does not work at all.

Is it good idea to "copy pasta" this code? Not at all.
We wouldn't like to say that Vertcoin developers are not good, in fact, they are excellent (probably, they were very busy with more important things while creating their paper wallet, those issues with the paper wallet are not so important - in fact, seems like nobody even noticed). This is just to point out that our commitment is to improve and innovate.

Why provoke a war?I like both Tongue