Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 19, 2014, 06:17:59 AM

Quote from: illodin on June 19, 2014, 06:11:56 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 19, 2014, 05:56:03 AM

Quote from: illodin on June 19, 2014, 05:18:12 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 19, 2014, 05:10:40 AM

Quote from: illodin on June 19, 2014, 05:04:39 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 19, 2014, 03:25:49 AM

Yea dude, lets fork from a decentralised system to a centralised system, whoop de doooo.

You're very confused. Do you understand what centralized and decentralized means?

Yes. So please explain in detail how the DRK system doesn't use master nodes, a semi-centralised authority.

No. Please explain in detail how the XC system doesn't use xnodes, a semi-centralised authority.

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 19, 2014, 05:56:03 AM

Xnodes don't require 17 BTC to run

Only reason why xnode doesn't require 17 BTC is because xc is worthless. If it 10x or 100x in value then it's gonna be just as "expensive".

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 19, 2014, 05:56:03 AM

The code is also out in the open, unlike DRK. How much less decentralised can you get than closed source?
You keep posting here about XCs latest source not being available yet but when has DRKs?

Contradicting yourself much? Xnode source is not out in the open.

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 19, 2014, 05:56:03 AM

they don't require a setup on a separate server with their own security to operate safely.

XC requires dedicated nodes to operate at all. Would you rather run your distributed app on hundreds or even thousands of dedicated servers with gigabit connections or on average Joes' laptops running on wi-fi connections? Btw, drk's masternode payments solve the problem that is very real even in bitcoin, which is that not many people are willing to run nodes because there is no incentive.

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 19, 2014, 05:56:03 AM

And why do you think Evan hasn't released the DRK source?

Because otherwise we'd have tens of drk clones by now copy-pasted by clueless devs and people losing their monies in them.

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 19, 2014, 05:56:03 AM

Closed source = decentralised.

So xc is decentralised by your definition then.

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 19, 2014, 05:56:03 AM

Enjoy.

You're welcome.

Wow. Are you guys that much shills you ignore what's right infront of you?

https://github.com/atcsecure/X11COIN

XNode system code. Yes, it isn't the latest, but at least it's the base code.

Anyways, The reason DRKs code isn't available at all is the same reason it took him an entire month to fix a bug he called 'simple'

He's out of his depth and scared. And of course he should be scared of clones, other teams would do a better job at creating a clone than he will creating the original. XC already has its clones and they are miles behind. It's the advantage of having a qualified Dev, it doesn't matter who else has your code aslong as your a better coder. With Evan there are a hundred better coders in the altcoin space. With dan I'm struggling to think of even one

And nope, comparing market caps, XC nodes cost ten time less.

And of course you wouldn't want them run on a small ammount of professionally run servers, you want to spread the load as much as possible to stop a small amount of nodes cracking the paths.

You can keep thinking these limiting factors are advantages but they are not. They are characteristics of a seriously outdated system.

Enjoy again.

I guess you were not around when the entire community was laughing at the XC dev as he didnt know how to use github properly. Also that the PoS component of your coin was outsourced to loljosh as he was most probably out of his league.

Also you forget that your coin's algorithm was created by Darkcoin dev (x11) and was subsequently named after it. And yes XC is worthless