Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 20, 2014, 08:43:45 PM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 20, 2014, 08:06:01 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on June 20, 2014, 07:58:28 PM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 20, 2014, 07:47:23 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on June 20, 2014, 07:34:45 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 20, 2014, 07:22:23 PM

Judging by the fact XC is up 10% since DRK forked looks like a few of the fanclub are realising... XC is a superior coin with a much superior dev.

So when your coin was going down as Cryptcoin was going up, and you were panicking about what was going on with Crypt and why were people buying it instead of "superior XC" what did that mean for XC? That Mindfox is better and "superior" to Dan?

These superiority stuff is bullshit.

Satoshi = brilliant guy that invented TRUSTLESS transactions which solved a decades old problem, not through a "trust learning algo" but through proof of work. Nobody disputes this.

XC = a coin that is "superior" because it goes back to trusted transactions, taking people back to the original problem that should have already been solved.

Apparently XC's dev should have also written a paper on why Satoshi is a fool and why we should all have trusted transactions instead of trustless. He is after all the superior dev of all altcoins.

You obviously don't keep up with the times. XC will be trustless with multi-sig in Rev 2.

Any other arguments?

You said you have the superior coin, when it used TRUSTED transactions. I don't need to make any other argument, you just made a fool of yourself.

All this superiority talk I hear from day one.

Dan makes a centralized mixer "wowwwwwwwwww we did more than DRK did in months"... just for making a centralized mixer, lol.

Then he makes the "decentralized" trusted mixers that lost coins and you are like "WOOOOWWWWW FIRST WORKING ANON", lol.

Now you are telling me, ok I'm not really superior, but one day I will be.

It's june 20th 2014. I've heard about the NSA-proof Rev 2.0 for over a month when it was supposed to be delivered in 2-3 weeks.

=> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.msg6932856#msg6932856

...and we haven't even solved the issue of trusted transactions.

So, instead of being here and being happy for the problems of others, go back and solve your own problems. It's more productive.

No dude. Your the one making a fool out of yourself. Rev 2 was given a timeline for the first week in July. Dan hasn't missed a deadline yet, unlike Evan who sets deadlines months in advance and still fails to deliver. Rev 2 will use trustless multisig. Please explain how these will be trusted transactions? Owww wait. You can't.

And also, I'm not telling you XC will be superior. I'm telling you XC is superior now. Even Chaplin admitted that DRK won't even be close to XCs level of anonymity until RC4. XC has a 1BTC bounty for finding a link, nobody has broken it yet.

XC has accomplished in six weeks what DRK couldn't do in six months. Imagine how far ahead its going to be in four months when your RC4 is finally released?

And that NSA level security is likely because XC has an NSA level Dev. He's developed groundbreaking world firsts in technology and its internationally renown. He's also worked for companies such as IBM. Allot more than I can say for dan who is struggling to fix one 'simple' bug after a month. Something XC never had a single issue in implementing.

Quote from: AlexGR on June 20, 2014, 08:28:43 PM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 20, 2014, 08:06:01 PM

No dude. Your the one making a fool out of yourself. Rev 2 was given a timeline for the first week in July.

You mean updated timeline.

Back in mid to late May, the full-blown implementation was supposed to take place 3-4 weeks later.

Quote

Please explain how these will be trusted transactions? Owww wait. You can't.

Yes I can't tell you about future stuff. I can only discuss what you have now.

Quote

And also, I'm not telling you XC will be superior. I'm telling you XC is superior now. Even Chaplin admitted that DRK won't even be close to XCs level of anonymity until RC4. XC has a 1BTC bounty for finding a link, nobody has broken it yet,

Ok sell your house and buy XC if you believe in it so much. Why come here and tell us how DRK sucks and why XC is so superior - when it's vapor? You (XC) wouldn't even be here without DRK. XC and a plethora of anoncoins and scamcoins just tried to pull the same pattern as with all other coins.

Dogecoin => let's make some memecoins or animalcoins
Aurora => let's make some countrycoins
Blackcoin => let's make PoW/PoS coins or colorcoins
Darkcoin => let's make anonymous coins (and since we can't do that, let's do hacks with the wallets, setup central mixers or write "whitepapers")

It's always the same for people who lost the train of the first one and want to catch (or create) a train that they can ride on, while crapping on the market leader.

Of course you can explain about future stuff. We both know in two weeks XC will use multisig and that will make the transactions trustless. Your entire argument for why XC is flawed is out of the window.

And what XC has now? We have anonymous transactions with working node systems. Two things DRK doesn't have.

lost the train? Dude, its obvious. Your technology is inferior and your Dev's are inferior. Your still buying yahoo stock while everyone else is about to see google.

I remember when XC was just being born and all the scared DRK fanboys ran over to the XC thread to say it was all empty promises and the technology was flawed. Now all those promises are getting delivered and its your technology that is full of empty promises, and clearly flawed, its nice to return the favour.

Just remember, it took DRK six months to get to the flawed state it is in now, while it took XC 6 week to better it.

XC is a dead coin that was pumped and dumped by people looking to make a quick buck that missed the Darkcoin train. Don't mistake p/d'ers chasing a quick buck for innovation. Fuck they can't even come up with their own branding! Darkcoin didn't simple copy paste the another coin's code and launch "AnothercoinsAlgocoin". Then turn around and talk shit about the originalcoins devs. In fact, I haven't personally witnessed any of the DRK devs degrade another coins development team; In fact, it's quite the opposite.. They've been working with other developers from other coins which is how the crypto community should ACTUALLY be functioning - not against each other.

Any person that goes into another coin's thread and spreads bullshit to promote his or her coin is trash. Same goes to any coin developer - if you need to talk shit about a coin you copied to make up for its lack of innovation it translates into you and your coin project are trash.